Results

Fish Species Used Old Results New Results with Phylomarker
1. Exons in four model species of fish
Danio rerion(version: Z.0) 6746 8256
Takifugu rubripes (version: Fugu 2.0): 3483 4391
Gasterosteus aculeatus(version: BROAD S1): 3283 3262
Oryzias latipes (version: MEDAKA 1): 2873 2479
Tetraodon nigroviridis N/A 2314
 
2. Putative single copy exons in four model species of fish
Danio rerion: 2797 1894
Takifugu rubripes: 1822 835
Gasterosteus aculeatus: 2132 1150
Oryzias latipes: 1809 948
Tetraodon nigroviridis N/A 858
3. Putative orthologs between model fish species
Danio rerion vs Takifugu rubripes: 138 27
Danio rerion vs Gasterosteus aculeatus: 131* 60
Danio rerion vs Oryzias latipes: 113* 49
Danio rerion vs Tetraodon nigroviridis N/A 42
Takifugu rubripes vs Gasterosteus aculeatus: 281 62
Takifugu rubripes vs Oryzias latipes: 208 34
Takifugu rubripes vs Tetraodon nigroviridis: N/A 160
Tetraodon nigroviridis vs Oryzias latipes: N/A 36
Tetraodon nigroviridis vs Gasterosteus aculeatus: N/A 66
Gasterosteus aculeatus vs Oryzias latipes: 225 129
* 20% coverage applied instead of 50%
4. Putative orthologs among 3 model fish species
(Takifugu rubripes vs Oryzias latipes) AND (Takifugu rubripes vs Gasterosteus aculeatus): 155 25(80/20)
(Takifugu rubripes vs Oryzias latipes) AND (Takifugu rubripes vs Danio rerion): 61 8(80/20)
(Takifugu rubripes vs Oryzias latipes) AND (Takifugu rubripes vs Tetraodon nigroviridis) N/A 17(80/20)
(Takifugu rubripes vs Gasterosteus aculeatus) AND (Takifugu rubripes vs Danio rerion): 63 9(80/20)
(Takifugu rubripes vs Tetraodon nigroviridis) AND (Takifugu rubripes vs Gasterosteus aculeatus) N/A 37(80/20)
(Takifugu rubripes vs Tetraodon nigroviridis) AND (Takifugu rubripes vs Danio rerion) N/A 8(80/20)
5. Putative orthologs among 4 model fish species
(Takifugu rubripes vs Oryzias latipes) AND (Takifugu rubripes vs Gasterosteus aculeatus) AND (Takifugu rubripes vs Danio rerion):: 41 N/A